Survey Of Non-Motorized Trail Use By Oregon State Parks
Re: Survey Of Non-Motorized Trail Use By Oregon State Parks
Folks that live out of state and/or occasionally visit OR will not spend as much time on this survey. Took me about ten minutes.
"Why are you always chasing women?"
"I'll tell you as soon as I catch one!"
"I'll tell you as soon as I catch one!"
- RobFromRedland
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
Re: Survey Of Non-Motorized Trail Use By Oregon State Parks
You know, Tom, building NEW trails is good, but there are a TON of EXISTING trails that have been abandoned over the years that would take MUCH less effort and money to bring back to usable shape. I don't understand why more effort isn't put into reclaiming abandoned trails.... I for one would like to see more effort into making some NETWORKS of trails (like there used to be before all the roads were built) that would allow some interesting loop options for hikes rather than always having to do out and back hikes for day hikers.Splintercat wrote:I just completed the survey -- it's surprisingly long and (like most surveys) a bit frustrating, but this is a good opportunity weigh in with one of the few agencies that seems interested in BUILDING NEW TRAILS! The survey isn't limited to OPRD lands, but instead is attempting to measure trail preferences and priorities. It took me about 20 minutes to complete.
Tom
With the push to close roads, I think it would be great to bring back some of the historical trail networks to replace access. Trails are WAY cheaper to maintain than roads are.
And just for the record, I completed the survey as well. It was pretty long and somewhat repetitive, but maybe it will do some good. It certainly can't hurt.
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: WOW! What a ride! - Hunter S. Thompson
- acorn woodpecker
- Posts: 240
- Joined: January 4th, 2013, 8:35 pm
Re: Survey Of Non-Motorized Trail Use By Oregon State Parks
I second all you've said, Rob. While completing the survey, I was choosing to de-emphasize new trails and make new trailheads but felt I couldn't express my sentiments to re-open new ones as I didn't feel that was what the question was asking. The survey questions seemed to imply that entirely new trail systems should be built.RobFromRedland wrote:You know, Tom, building NEW trails is good, but there are a TON of EXISTING trails that have been abandoned over the years that would take MUCH less effort and money to bring back to usable shape. I don't understand why more effort isn't put into reclaiming abandoned trails.... I for one would like to see more effort into making some NETWORKS of trails (like there used to be before all the roads were built) that would allow some interesting loop options for hikes rather than always having to do out and back hikes for day hikers.Splintercat wrote:I just completed the survey -- it's surprisingly long and (like most surveys) a bit frustrating, but this is a good opportunity weigh in with one of the few agencies that seems interested in BUILDING NEW TRAILS! The survey isn't limited to OPRD lands, but instead is attempting to measure trail preferences and priorities. It took me about 20 minutes to complete.
Tom
With the push to close roads, I think it would be great to bring back some of the historical trail networks to replace access. Trails are WAY cheaper to maintain than roads are.
And just for the record, I completed the survey as well. It was pretty long and somewhat repetitive, but maybe it will do some good. It certainly can't hurt.
With numerous forest roads looking to be closed in the coming years and very little new money to maintain them it makes a lot of sense to decommission them and maintain appropriate ones as trails instead (especially if they can tie into a greater network of existing trails or old roads). This seems especially so in the Clackamas River areas. Wished I could have made it to that meeting earlier this month in Estacada that addressed the issue.
Re: Survey Of Non-Motorized Trail Use By Oregon State Parks
The folks at Microsoft always used to tell me, "We can't use 'We fixed the bug!' as a bullet" on the new & improved presentation. Customers expect that to happen and demand new features before willingly paying for the new version. (Go figure? ) Sounds like the same thinking has crept in here. Maintenance just isn't sexy.acorn woodpecker wrote:With numerous forest roads looking to be closed in the coming years and very little new money to maintain them it makes a lot of sense to decommission them and maintain appropriate ones as trails instead (especially if they can tie into a greater network of existing trails or old roads).
Karl
Back on the trail, again...
Back on the trail, again...
- RobFromRedland
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
Re: Survey Of Non-Motorized Trail Use By Oregon State Parks
Yeah, but they could recondition old abandoned trails and then make it sound like it is a NEW trail (in some regards it would be)!kepPNW wrote: The folks at Microsoft always used to tell me, "We can't use 'We fixed the bug!' as a bullet" on the new & improved presentation. Customers expect that to happen and demand new features before willingly paying for the new version. (Go figure? ) Sounds like the same thinking has crept in here. Maintenance just isn't sexy.
Maintenance is definitely NOT sexy, but it is what makes the world go round....Maintenance in the software world is something like 75% or more of the total cost of software. I'd guess that trails would be in a similar vein. It takes a lot more to maintain them than it did to originally build them (especially the really old ones which only cost a few thousand dollars to build in the first place).
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming: WOW! What a ride! - Hunter S. Thompson
- Grannyhiker
- Posts: 4598
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
- Location: Gateway to the Columbia Gorge
Re: Survey Of Non-Motorized Trail Use By Oregon State Parks
Just filled it out; unfortunately I spend 1/3 to 1/2 of my time on Washington trails, which of course is not reflected in the survey. I put "highest" on wanting trail maintenance, new trails, security at trailhead parking. Another thing not brought out in the survey is the need for shorter but interesting trails for those of us for whom 5 miles is getting into the marathon category. (The Old Gray Mare ain't what she used to be/Many long years ago.) Too bad they didn't have a comment section!
- Don Nelsen
- Posts: 4381
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
- Location: Vancouver, WA
Re: Survey Of Non-Motorized Trail Use By Oregon State Parks
Ok, I filled it out - took 20 minutes. I think its good they offered this survey - I'd be curious as to the results.
dn
dn
"Everything works in the planning stage" - Kelly
"If you don't do it this year, you will be one year older when you do" - Warren Miller
"If you don't do it this year, you will be one year older when you do" - Warren Miller
- Splintercat
- Posts: 8334
- Joined: May 28th, 2008, 10:03 pm
- Location: Portland
- Contact:
Re: Survey Of Non-Motorized Trail Use By Oregon State Parks
Totally agreed on this, Rob... except I don't see it as a choice we should have to make: all of the above, please! Building and maintaining trails is chump change in the scope of state and federal budgets, IMHO, so it's really more a matter of making trails (and more generally, caring for public lands) a PRIORITY in how public dollars are spent. The nice thing about this survey is that the OPRD is asking very broad questions about demand, so that helps get at this larger issue of priorities.You know, Tom, building NEW trails is good, but there are a TON of EXISTING trails that have been abandoned over the years that would take MUCH less effort and money to bring back to usable shape. I don't understand why more effort isn't put into reclaiming abandoned trails.... I for one would like to see more effort into making some NETWORKS of trails (like there used to be before all the roads were built) that would allow some interesting loop options for hikes rather than always having to do out and back hikes for day hikers.
Thanks for completing the survey, everyone!
Tom